Quick game with Tarobots
Start immediately. Tarobots fill every remaining seat.
No time limit
Last updated:
Play with others or start immediately with bots
Start immediately. Tarobots fill every remaining seat.
No time limit
Choose the rounds, turn time, table style, and card back.
Start immediately. Tarobots fill every remaining seat.
No time limit
Choose the rounds, turn time, table style, and card back.
Start immediately. Tarobots fill every remaining seat.
No time limit
Choose the rounds, turn time, table style, and card back.
Play Tarock Online supports free browser games for two, three or four players, including practice against Tarobots. These answers explain access, supported table sizes, the deck and device requirements. For bidding, scoring and legal card choices, continue with the detailed guide and the rules for your selected format.
Yes. Play Tarock Online offers free browser-based Slovenian tarock. Create an account and join an open table. Gold membership and cosmetic products are optional features; an ordinary open-table game does not require buying a card design.
The portal supports tables for 2, 3 or 4 players. Four players receive 12 cards each and three players receive 16 each, with a 6-card talon in both formats. The two-player version uses its own hand-and-pile layout.
Yes. A table’s creator can add Tarobots to empty seats. You can practise the available player-count formats without waiting for a complete human group, then review decisions using a recording when one is available.
The deck has 54 cards: 22 trumps and 32 suit cards. Each of the four suits has 8 cards. Pagat, Mond and Škis form the trula. Card values are counted in groups of three, and the complete deck totals 70 card points.
No download is needed to use the browser portal on a computer, tablet or phone. Sign in, choose a table and use the on-screen controls. A stable connection is important during live games; check the rules for your selected player count before starting.
Learn Slovenian tarock by understanding the deck, choosing a player count and following each stage from bidding to scoring. The guide below explains the portal’s rules and controls, with examples of legal play, talon exchanges and card-point counting. It also shows how to practise and review recorded decisions.
Play Tarock Online is a browser-based portal for Slovenian tarock with tables for 2, 3 or 4 players. You can play with other people or add computer-controlled Tarobots. The game uses a 54-card deck, while the rules page explains the differences between the supported player counts.
Tarock is a trick-taking card game: players contribute cards to a trick, one player wins those cards, and the round is scored according to the chosen contract. It rewards remembering which cards have appeared, recognising when trumps are running out, and understanding what a partner may need. The portal handles dealing, legal card choices and score calculations, so you can concentrate on decisions. Start with a short game and read the rules for the selected format. This guide describes this portal’s implementation; a familiar name does not mean that every regional tarock rule is identical.
To start, create an account, sign in and choose a table for 2, 3 or 4 players in the playing lounge. Join a waiting table or create your own. If seats are empty, the creator can add Tarobots. The creator starts the game after the table is ready.
Before joining, check the player count and the table’s settings. The same 54-card deck produces different decisions when cards are distributed between three people, four people or the two-player layout. Choose a manageable number of rounds for a first session. After the deal, read the current stage and the available actions rather than clicking through unfamiliar declarations. The interface indicates whose turn it is and limits card play to legal choices. If a declaration summary offers Continue, use that moment to read it. A useful first objective is completing a round while understanding each action, rather than immediately maximising your score.
Choose four players for the called-king partnership format, three players for a game in which each player has a larger starting hand, or two players for the portal’s distinct layout with hands and card piles. These are 3 supported table formats, not interchangeable views of one deal.
In the four-player format, each player starts with 12 cards and 6 cards form the talon: 4 × 12 + 6 = 54. In the three-player format, each player starts with 16 cards and the talon still contains 6: 3 × 16 + 6 = 54. The two-player game adds decisions about exposed pile cards and revealing the cards underneath them. Do not carry assumptions about talon selection, partnerships or bidding from one format into another without checking its rules. Beginners who want to understand a traditional partnership round can choose four players and fill the remaining seats with Tarobots.
The Slovenian tarock deck contains 54 cards: 22 permanent trumps and 32 suit cards. The suit cards are divided into hearts, diamonds, clubs and spades, with 8 cards in each suit. Pagat is trump I, Mond is trump XXI, and Škis is the highest trump.
The arithmetic is useful when learning to count cards: 22 + 4 × 8 = 54. Each suit has four court cards and four numeral cards. A king, queen, cavalier and jack have different point values, so winning the greatest number of cards does not necessarily mean winning the greatest number of card points. Learn to recognise the court cards before trying to remember every illustration. Our card gallery gives the designs context, while the rules describe rank and value. The artwork is a visual representation of a card; changing a design does not change its code, legal use, rank or scoring value.
Bidding determines the contract and who will attempt it. A contract changes the objective, the use of the talon and, where applicable, the partnership. On this portal, the available choices depend on the player count and current bidding stage; the interface offers actions valid for that situation.
Read the name of the contract before accepting it. A positive contract asks the declaring side to win enough card points, whereas a negative contract has a different target. Berač asks for no tricks, while Pikolo asks for exactly one; their decisions cannot be evaluated by simply preferring high cards. In talon contracts, Tri, Dve and Ena refer to selecting 3, 2 or 1 talon cards respectively. A hand with several strong trumps may support a different plan from a hand with awkward unprotected court cards. Consult the contract descriptions for the chosen format rather than assuming a bid has the same meaning everywhere.
The talon is a separate group of 6 cards used by certain contracts. The declaring player selects a permitted packet, adds those cards to the hand and discards the required number. Depending on the contract, packets contain 3, 2 or 1 card; other contracts do not permit an exchange.
The important decision is which packet improves a coherent plan, not merely which packet contains the single most attractive card. Consider whether the exchange strengthens a suit, removes a weakness or adds a useful trump. After taking cards, respect the restrictions on discarding valuable cards and trumps: the interface is there to enforce the portal’s version of those rules. A king’s location can also affect the partnership in the four-player format. The talon is therefore both a source of cards and new information. In a first game, pause at this stage and compare your hand before and after the exchange.
In an ordinary trick, you must follow the led suit when you can. If you cannot follow suit, you must use a trump when the rules require it and you have one. The portal highlights legal choices, but negative contracts can add requirements that make a different card compulsory.
For example, holding a card in the led suit usually prevents you from playing an unrelated high trump simply because you want to win the trick. When no card of that suit remains in your hand, the decision changes. In negative contracts, the obligation to overtake can matter as well as the obligation to follow suit. Read the relevant rules before treating a disabled card as a technical fault. A useful learning habit is to predict the legal cards before looking at the highlighted choices. When your prediction differs, inspect the led suit, your remaining trumps and the active contract in that order.
Tarock card points are counted in groups of 3, subtracting 2 points from each complete group. The complete 54-card deck contains 70 card points under this method. Kings and the 3 trula cards each have a basic value of 5; other court cards have lower values.
A queen counts 4, a cavalier 3 and a jack 2 before the group deduction. Other cards have a basic value of 1. As a concrete example, a king, queen and low card have raw values 5 + 4 + 1; subtracting 2 gives a group worth 8 card points. These card points must be distinguished from the final game score, which can include the contract, announcements and multipliers. The round result explains the captured cards and the calculation. Use that result to understand a surprising score instead of estimating the total from the number of tricks alone.
Pagat, Mond and Škis are the 3 trula cards: the lowest trump, trump XXI and the highest trump. Each has a basic counting value of 5 points. Their special status means that strength in a trick and value when counting captured cards are related, but different, ideas.
Pagat illustrates the distinction especially clearly: it is the weakest trump in ordinary rank but is still a valuable captured card. An attempt to win the last trick with it is a specific undertaking, not something to announce merely because Pagat appears in your hand. Mond is powerful but can be vulnerable to Škis and to the special interactions described in the rules. Trula announcements are also separate from simply starting with the three cards. Learning these cards first gives you a practical way to read the flow of trumps, understand announcements and explain why a low-looking card can influence a round’s result.
Yes. The creator can add Tarobots to empty seats, allowing you to practise without waiting for a complete group of human players. Choose a 2-, 3- or 4-player table and use the same stage indicators and legal-card controls that are used when other people occupy the seats.
Use practice games to answer one question at a time. You might concentrate on following suit for one round, then on evaluating a talon packet in the next. Computer opponents provide a way to repeat situations, but their choices do not guarantee the best line of play and should not replace the rules. Tarok has also been studied in computer-game research: the 2003 paper A Program for Playing Tarok discusses a three-player program and game complexity. That paper concerns Silicon Tarokist; the portal’s Tarobots are a separate implementation. A replay is useful for revisiting both your choices and a computer opponent’s response.
To play with other people, choose the same waiting table in the lounge and fill its available seats before the creator starts it. Check the table’s player count and access requirements first. The supported table sizes are 2, 3 and 4, so agree on a format before inviting others.
For a first shared session, agree on the format and the expected length of the game rather than assuming everyone knows the same house rules. If your group is incomplete, the creator can add a Tarobot for a remaining seat. Private-room and Gold features depend on the account’s available access, so use the choices actually offered by the portal. Keep table discussion courteous and avoid revealing hidden cards during a live round. If you want to discuss a decision in detail, finish the relevant play and use the recording afterward, where the cards and sequence can be inspected without changing the live game.
A recorded game lets you revisit the sequence of play, while analysis can reveal all hands to explain decisions that were made with incomplete information. Use the playback controls to move through events, change the viewing player and inspect the round. A replay is a record, not a live table.
Start with one turning point rather than watching without a question. Note which cards were visible to the player at that moment, then compare that information with what analysis reveals. A move that looks obvious with every hand exposed may have been uncertain during play. Keep the distinction between a player’s knowledge and the complete deal throughout the review. Comparing two plausible choices is often more useful than labelling a losing move a mistake solely because of the result. The recording can also help explain talon exchanges, announcements and scoring. Availability depends on the game having a recording accessible through the portal.
Perfect versus imperfect information in game analysis (Arjonilla et al., 2024; English)
Probabilities describe a stated model of unknown cards; they do not predict a guaranteed result. For a uniformly shuffled 54-card deck containing 22 trumps, a random 6-card talon has at least one trump about 96.49% of the time before you inspect your own hand. Known cards change the calculation.
This figure is an original combinatorial calculation: subtract the probability of selecting six non-trumps from 1, using 1 − C(32,6) / C(54,6). It is not a measured success rate for players or bots. In the four-player format, if a particular called king is absent from your 12 cards and you have no other information, its chance of being in the six-card talon is 6 / 42, approximately 14.29%. Once cards are exposed or a bid supplies useful evidence, the original model is no longer the whole story. The numbers page explains the assumptions and calculations in more detail.
No. Slovenian tarock belongs to a wider family of tarot card games, but contracts, partnerships and scoring vary by region. Familiarity with Königrufen, Hungarian tarokk or Czech taroky is helpful background rather than proof that every local rule applies here. Use the portal’s rules for the selected player count.
Names are not a reliable substitute for checking the objective and procedure. Two variants can use a similar deck yet differ in the number of cards retained, what a bid permits or how a bonus is resolved. Even a group of experienced players may bring different house rules to the same table. The practical advantage of an online rules engine is a consistent implementation within a game. Before raising a disagreement, identify the exact contract, player count and stage, then compare the event with the published portal rules. The history and card-gallery pages provide context without replacing those operational instructions.
If your connection drops, return to the portal, sign in if necessary and look for the game you can resume. Avoid opening a different table before checking your active game. A temporary disconnection and choosing Leave game are different actions, so read the confirmation before deliberately leaving a session.
Before starting, use a connection you expect to remain available and choose a game length that fits the time you have. When an action appears delayed, check the current turn and wait for the card movement to settle before repeatedly submitting it. The game’s timing and automated-player behaviour are governed by its server state, not by how often a button is clicked. If a problem persists, record the game and round context when reporting it. That gives a clearer starting point than a general description of a frozen screen. Account access, server availability and the state of the room still determine whether a game can be resumed.
Improve by combining the rules, short practice sessions and review of particular decisions. Begin with legal card play and counting, then add bidding, talon evaluation and announcements. The useful measure is whether you can explain a decision using information available at the time, rather than whether one shuffled deal happened to reward it.
A practical three-step routine is to choose one learning goal, complete a game and revisit one uncertain decision. For example, practise identifying valuable cards, then compare the captured groups with the round’s result. Later, track how many trumps have appeared and how a called partnership changes your plan. Use the rules, card gallery and probability guide as references when a specific question arises. Performance over a small sample can be misleading, because deals, partners, contracts and opponents differ. Review the quality of the reasoning alongside the result. This approach gives a new player a concrete path from recognising the 54 cards to understanding a complete round.
We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Attempting to reconnect